Jogging and cycling – two popular and healthy energizer. But which sport cuts in direct comparison did better. We take a closer look at the duo and compare it using various parameters such as calories burned, weight training, costs, stress on joints, flexibility and security and have a clear winner.
One away: both Jog and Cycling are ideal to train your endurance, lose weight, improve his fitness and health to do something good. Yet there is little between the two sports but subtle differences. If you still considering between the two sports back and forth, the following may help direct comparison.
Jogging – Cycling: question about the calories
Clear points victory for running. The average calorie consumption of a jogger at a running speed is 850 calories. The cyclist must be at least twice as fast to it, at least on 600 calories to bring. The simple reason: When you work a lot more muscle than jogging on the bike, so that more calories are burned. Who wants to impoverish themselves properly in a short time and burn more fat at the same time, should prefer running to biking.
Jogging – Cycling: the question of muscle training
Re-point victory for running. When Running Training be in addition to the leg muscles and the arms and torso moves. This not only guarantees stability during walking, but provides a higher caloric consumption and at the end is done more for the fitness. While cycling are “merely” trained legs and buttocks.
Jogging – Cycling: the question of costs
It’s getting boring: re-cuts from jogging better. While good for a Cycling from 500 € upwards on the table must have a few decent Running shoes between 80 and 120 € to have and therefore much cheaper. Although the wear of the shoes is higher compared to the wheel, but it still costs include helmet, or regularly scheduled repairs. Even if one buys new shoes every year, it will take several years to have spent the cost of a bicycle.
Jogging – Cycling: the question of joint loading
Here you can convince the cycling. The pedaling is for the Joints gentlyAct as the forces when walking on the knee or ankle. In addition, the force of the impact is less. Athletes with Joint problems are better off on the bike and should prefer to walk. Even beginners cycling for sport is better for the joints of the load while jogging is still unfamiliar.
Jogging – Cycling: the question of security
Anyone who thinks the sport especially at the level of security should definitely go skiing. Although there is the risk that they might inflict umknickt and a torn ligament, but the Cycling it can be much more serious accidents occur more quickly. Only because of the higher speed and more contact with cars.
Jogging – Cycling: question about the difficulty
Cycling here has its advantages, provided one is able to maintain his balance. Jogging may look unassuming on first glance, but this is a misconception. For questions about proper breathing, running technique and good coordination, all of which are important for economical running, should not be underestimated. Otherwise you’re out of breath quickly suffer and motivation.
Jogging – Cycling: the question of flexibility
Clear thing: you only need to run his running shoes that fit comfortably in each bag. Simply put, and now you can jog anywhere. Cycling is one of the logically dependent on the bicycle. That has not always at hand and to act even more difficult than running in the winter. Unless you have an exercise bike at home, but are sometimes left out of it. Fitness bike information here.
Conclusion
Even though jogging is apparent in direct comparison to cycling as the clear winner on points, there is no winner. Because this can only mean the health, fitness and fun. And those who prefer to ride rather than walk goes, should not umsatteln spasmodically. For without the fun of it you will soon hang his racing career on the nail.